[156581] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Big Temporary Networks

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (TJ)
Thu Sep 20 10:01:03 2012

In-Reply-To: <505AB5E1.7080204@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
From: TJ <trejrco@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:59:39 -0400
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: trejrco@gmail.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Masataka Ohta <
mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wrote:

> David Miller wrote:
>
> > So, a single example of IPv4 behaving in a suboptimal manner would be
> > enough to declare IPv4 not operational?
>
> For example?
>

"Heavy reliance on broadcast for a wide range of instances where the
traffic is really only destined for a single node" would seem to be rather
sub-optimal.

/TJ

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post