[156538] in North American Network Operators' Group
They aren't on *MY* Internet, so I should get their space!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jo Rhett)
Wed Sep 19 14:16:15 2012
From: Jo Rhett <jrhett@netconsonance.com>
In-Reply-To: <B593371C-EDC1-404F-A3A0-0BDFFFF3F403@consultant.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:14:58 -0700
To: Cutler James R <james.cutler@consultant.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I'm renaming the thread to what the argument really is.
On Sep 19, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Cutler James R wrote:
> On Sep 19, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Jo Rhett <jrhett@netconsonance.com> =
wrote:
>>=20
>> And second, have you ever worked on a private intranet that wasn't =
connected to the internet through a firewall? Skipping oob networks for =
equipment management, neither have I.
>=20
> Yes, for many years. External connections only via Application Level =
Gateways for SMTP, HTTP and Virtual Network connections. And, using =
assigned IPv4 addresses. And, no one willing to pay for IPv6.
You are making my point for me. Does your internet deal with duplication =
of IP space inside and outside the gateways? Is that easy to deal with?
Thus my point is made. Just because you don't have direct connectivity =
to *every* point on the Internet does not mean that you don't need =
unique space.
--=20
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : net philanthropy to improve open source and internet =
projects.
