[156440] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Ignorance
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Tue Sep 18 11:33:25 2012
In-Reply-To: <CA+3sbiOFHNNMcmUvwjuz0rZbKq=JWtiS0mdNLJ2vhAbyLPu4pg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 11:31:07 -0400
To: Steve Meuse <smeuse@mara.org>
Cc: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs@seastrom.com>, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
It was supported before there. We were using it prior to that release. You n=
eeded a smu though. I can perhaps find details if they are that important fo=
r you.=20
Jared Mauch
On Sep 18, 2012, at 11:24 AM, Steve Meuse <smeuse@mara.org> wrote:
>=20
>=20
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> wrot=
e:
>>=20
>>=20
>> We've been doing this for years on both Juniper & IOS/IOS-XR devices. Mu=
st be someone else.
>=20
> I may be wrong, but IOS-XR on A9K only supported v6 on bundle-ether interf=
aces as of 4.1.2-ish.=20
>=20
> That, of course, leads to the conversation of keeping function parity betw=
een same software revs but different hardware platforms. I understand the is=
sues there, but doesn't make deploying a feature any easier....
>=20
> -Steve
> =20
