[1564] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Yakov Rekhter)
Fri Jan 26 10:35:23 1996
To: Daniel Karrenberg <Daniel.Karrenberg@ripe.net>
cc: smd@sprint.net, nanog@merit.edu, cidrd@iepg.org, iab@isi.edu, iesg@isi.edu,
iana@isi.edu, Local Internet Registries in Europe <local-ir@ripe.net>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 26 Jan 96 11:58:22 +0100."
<9601261058.AA10837@ncc.ripe.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 96 07:24:44 PST
From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@cisco.com>
Daniel,
> If you insist on prefix-length filtering I have proposed a soloution
> for future address space allocated via the RIPE NCC several times:
>
> - set your inbound prefix length filter to /19.
>
> - The RIPE NCC will *guarantee* that we will not make more than
> 1024 non-aggregateable allocations from each /8.
Would the RIPE NCC provide such non-aggregatable allocations
irrespective of how many hosts would be covered by such an
allocation ?
Yakov.
