[156396] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Big Temporary Networks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nick Hilliard)
Mon Sep 17 11:48:17 2012
X-Envelope-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:47:13 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <505663DE.7000309@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 17/09/2012 00:42, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> OTOH, IPv6 requires many multicast received by STAs: RA and NS
> for DAD, for example.
>
> Worse, minimum intervals of ND messages are often very large,
> which means a lot of delay occurs when a message is lost.
So, what you're saying here is that a wifi network with lots of packet loss
will cause connectivity problems with ipv6?
Nick
