[156305] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Big Temporary Networks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Thornton)
Fri Sep 14 07:39:20 2012
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:38:24 +0100
From: Paul Thornton <prt@prt.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <505312AD.9050003@foobar.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 14/09/2012 12:19, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 14/09/2012 12:11, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>> I've used it a couple of times and then a week was sufficient (start
>> rigging on monday, everything done by thursday morning where 5000 people
>> show up with their computers (this was mainly 10/100 ports, people brought
>> their own cables), teardown and turning off the network, and then returning
>> the space to RIPE on monday.
>
> I will be talking about this at the address policy working group session at
> RIPE65. It shouldn't be too difficult to fix the problem, so long as it's
> clear what people actually need from these temporary addresses.
Veering slightly off-topic for NANOG, but is this worth taking onto the
address policy mailing list ahead of RIPE65 to ensure people who aren't
in the WG session are aware of the issue - and can therefore support (or
question) any proposed changes?
Paul.
--
Paul Thornton
