[156291] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Big Temporary Networks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Octavio Alvarez)
Fri Sep 14 03:21:33 2012
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>, "Jay Ashworth" <jra@baylink.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:20:33 -0700
From: "Octavio Alvarez" <alvarezp@alvarezp.ods.org>
In-Reply-To: <9737131.24604.1347572755433.JavaMail.root@benjamin.baylink.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:45:55 -0700, Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Måns Nilsson" <mansaxel@besserwisser.org>
>
>> 04:05:41PM +0000 Quoting Dylan Bouterse (dylan@corp.power1.com):
>> > I'm not sure if this is obvious for this list or not, but with your
>> > WiFi nodes, a good practice for that kind of density is more nodes,
>> > lower power. Keep the client connection load per AP as low as
>> > possible to improve overall performance. Jacking up the power in a
>> > small area like that will just step on the adjacent APs and cause
>> > issues.
I'd have expected someone to have QoS mentioned already, mainly to put
FTP and P2P traffic on the least important queues and don't hog up the
net.
--
Octavio.
Twitter: @alvarezp2000 -- Identi.ca: @alvarezp
