[156209] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The End-To-End Internet (was Re: Blocking MX query)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Masataka Ohta)
Tue Sep 11 18:18:17 2012
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 07:15:57 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <19751.1347364371@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
(2012/09/11 20:52), valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 05:51:53 +0900, Masataka Ohta said:
>
>> Anything written in RFC1796 should be ignored, because RFC1796, an
>> informational, not standard track, RFC, states so.
>
> On the other hand, if you're relying on the fact that 1796 is informational
No, I don't.
It's Jimmy, Eliot and you who are relying on a non standard track
RFC to deny RFC3102 and all the non standard track RFCs, which is
the silly paradox.
> Standard or not, we have Christian Huitema, John Postel, and Steve
> Crocker
If you have some respect to them, don't involve them with your
silly paradox.
Masataka Ohta
