[156161] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The End-To-End Internet (was Re: Blocking MX query)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nick Hilliard)
Mon Sep 10 09:16:26 2012
X-Envelope-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:14:50 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <504D1726.3090608@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 09/09/2012 23:24, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> Oliver wrote:
>> Just because something is documented in RFC does not automatically make it a
>> standard, nor does it necessarily make anyone care.
>
> That's not a valid argument against text in the RFC proof read by
> the RFC editor as the evidence of established terminology of the
> Internet community.
you may want to read rfc 1796, and then retract what you said because it
sounds silly.
Nick
