[15616] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: So, 11.3 anyone?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christian Kratzer)
Thu Mar 12 10:22:24 1998

From: Christian Kratzer <ck@toplink.net>
To: alex@nac.net (Alex Rubenstein)
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 08:56:52 +0100 (MET)
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980312005758.21553c-100000@iago.nac.net> from "Alex Rubenstein" at Mar 12, 98 00:59:29 am

Hi

> So, a potential reason came up for me to possibly run 11.3. I really don't
> want to, but I am comtemplating it.
> 
> Apparently, 11.3 has code to fast-switch policy-routed networks. Does it
> work? Is 11.3 really usable? I am scared to death, but may need this for a
> certain application.

we are running policy routing on our 3640 and 7206 machines and we quite fine 
without fast switched policy routing.  I would only think of using it if 
the cpu overhead starts getting unconformatably high.  

At the moment we are running 112-11.P without any major tilts.

Greetings
Christian Kratzer
Toplink

-- 
TopLink GbR, Internet Services			info@toplink.net
Christian Kratzer				http://www.toplink.net/
Phone: 	+49 7032 2701-0
Fax: 	+49 7032 2701-19	FreeBSD spoken here!

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post