[156114] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The End-To-End Internet (was Re: Blocking MX query)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Sep 6 15:29:25 2012
To: Andrew Sullivan <asullivan@dyn.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 06 Sep 2012 11:14:58 -0400."
<20120906151458.GC7079@dyn.com>
From: valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 15:27:51 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1346959671_1993P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 11:14:58 -0400, Andrew Sullivan said:
> Despite my scepticism of the overall project, I find the above claim a
> little hard to accept. RFC 2052, which defined SRV in an
> experiment, came out in 1996. SRV was moved to the standards track in
> 2000. I've never heard an argument why it won't work, and we know
> that SRV records are sometimes in use. Why couldn't that mechanism be
> used more widely?
My PS3 may want to talk to the world, but I have no control over Comcast's DNS.
--==_Exmh_1346959671_1993P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=o0nz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1346959671_1993P--
