[156100] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: RPKI Pilot Participant Notice
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Herrin)
Thu Sep 6 09:40:34 2012
In-Reply-To: <B2CB5F09-C842-4142-A586-A79992266269@corp.arin.net>
From: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 09:38:49 -0400
To: John Curran <jcurran@arin.net>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:37 AM, John Curran <jcurran@arin.net> wrote:
> If a relying party's use of PKI infrastructure legally equated to
> acceptance of the relying party agreement (RPA), then having an
> explicit record of acceptance of the RPA would not be necessary.
>
> Alas, it does not appear possible to equate use of PKI certificates
> with agreement to the associated RPA (and some might argue that this
> is a feature, as some folks would not want to be legally bound to an
> agreement which they did not explicitly review and accept.)
John, Randy:
I'm confused. Are you saying that unlike a whois lookup, I'll need a
contract with ARIN to look up and validate someone else's RPKI
certificate?
Would you clarify which parts of RPKI I need a contract with ARIN to
do and which parts I do not?
Thanks,
Bill Herrin
--
William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
