[156084] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The End-To-End Internet (was Re: Blocking MX query)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed Sep 5 19:43:55 2012
To: "John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "05 Sep 2012 23:07:07 -0000."
<20120905230707.24414.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 19:42:24 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1346888544_1993P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On 05 Sep 2012 23:07:07 -0000, "John Levine" said:
> Not really. Large mail system like Gmail and Yahoo have a pretty good
> map of the IPv4 address space. If you're sending from a residential
> DSL or cable modem range, they'll likely reject any mail you send
> directly no matter what you do.
Which is why I finally gave up and speak to an 800 pound gorilla on port 587,
because nobody dares to mess with that gorilla's port 587 so my laptop can
always get mail sent. :)
--==_Exmh_1346888544_1993P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=NvFy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1346888544_1993P--
