[156082] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The End-To-End Internet (was Re: Blocking MX query)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Levine)
Wed Sep 5 19:05:59 2012
Date: 5 Sep 2012 23:05:04 -0000
From: "John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <5047A2EA.8010307@hup.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
In article <5047A2EA.8010307@hup.org> you write:
>On 09/05/12 09:13 , Michael Thomas wrote:
>> The "I" part of DKIM is "Identified". That's all it promises. It's a
>> feature, not a bug, that spammers use it.
>
>Which is why DKIM does not really address any concerns. The spammers
>have reduced its value.
Nothing personal, but nobody who had the most rudimentary
understanding of what DKIM does and how it's intended to be used would
make such a statement.
See the archives of the IETF DKIM list for much, much, much more detail.
R's,
John
