[1560] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Bradner)
Fri Jan 26 09:30:43 1996
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 09:17:12 -0500 (EST)
From: Scott Bradner <sob@newdev.harvard.edu>
To: nanog@dune.silkroad.com, peter@demon.net
Cc: bass@dune.silkroad.com, cidrd@iepg.org, Daniel.Karrenberg@ripe.net,
forrestc@imach.com, iab@isi.edu, iana@isi.edu, iesg@isi.edu,
local-ir@ripe.net, nanog@merit.edu, smd@sprint.net, tli@cisco.com
> I think the hierarchical routeing is one step *worse* than the above.
> The address *defines* the route the packets take ? What about the real,
> live multi-interconnect, multi-homed Internet we use ? Maybe I have
> misunderstood the way IPv6 addressing works.
HR sure does sound real bad, just for grins what is your plan to keep
the routing table size within the constraints of the routers without it?
Scott
