|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: John van Oppen <jvanoppen@spectrumnet.us> To: 'james machado' <hvgeekwtrvl@gmail.com>, Blake Hudson <blake@ispn.net>, NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:00:30 +0000 In-Reply-To: <CADVasu7JxtO7vux5yyVs5w8YXT6UAcpmD=ZSUbaPtjhy3Kz6Sg@mail.gmail.com> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org I remember it too... I had a ticket get escalated from our support group = in about 2003 of a customer who could not get any internet access... they = had XP and had been assigned a .0 IP out of a /23 we were using for a speci= fic pop. That /23 came out of 64.0.0.0/8 so it was clearly a bit more bla= nket than a class based filter. They may have had some third party firewa= ll software on their machine, I can't remember, but I know my solution was = to be a bit disgusted and then exclude .255 and .0 from the pool. John
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |