|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: John van Oppen <jvanoppen@spectrumnet.us> To: 'james machado' <hvgeekwtrvl@gmail.com>, "STARNES, CURTIS" <Curtis.Starnes@granburyisd.org> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 23:01:04 +0000 In-Reply-To: <CADVasu730tGc8QB_qkoiONeMUvSXQDz4ZBOpQqn6gYWQOuWvRw@mail.gmail.com> Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org I have ended up excluding .0 and .255 from our DHCP pools in larger than /2= 4 subents due to this exact issue in the past... It is a PITA. I wish p= eople would update filters. John
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |