[155876] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eduardo Schoedler)
Wed Aug 29 12:34:00 2012
In-Reply-To: <4277105.1655.1346254798425.JavaMail.Administrator@TMA01>
From: Eduardo Schoedler <listas@esds.com.br>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:32:51 -0300
To: "Edward J. Dore" <edward.dore@freethought-internet.co.uk>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
MPLS and VPLS on RouterOS works very well.
--
Eduardo Schoedler
Em 29/08/2012, =C3=A0s 12:39, "Edward J. Dore" <edward.dore@freethought-inte=
rnet.co.uk> escreveu:
> MikroTik RouterOS is indeed based on Linux, however I believe they rolled t=
heir own MPLS stack.
>=20
> Last time I looked, the "mpls-linux" project over at SourceForge was incom=
plete and slow - I have no idea if this has changed at all recently however.=
>=20
> Edward Dore=20
> Freethought Internet=20
>=20
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Walter Keen" <walter.keen@rainierconnect.net>
> To: "Seth Mattinen" <sethm@rollernet.us>
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 29 August, 2012 2:00:52 AM
> Subject: Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited
>=20
> I'm fairly sure that Mikrotik software is based on linux, and supports MPL=
S.=20
>=20
> Not too sure which package they use, or if they rolled their own MPLS supp=
ort...=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> ----- Original Message -----
>=20
> From: "Seth Mattinen" <sethm@rollernet.us>=20
> To: nanog@nanog.org=20
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 4:42:14 PM=20
> Subject: Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited=20
>=20
>=20
> What's the state of MPLS on Linux these days?=20
>=20
> ~Seth=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
