[155808] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Bird vs Quagga revisited (MP-BGP RR)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Raymond Burkholder)
Thu Aug 23 10:06:15 2012
X-OneUnified-MailScanner-From: ray@oneunified.net
From: "Raymond Burkholder" <ray@oneunified.net>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:04:44 -0300
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>
> > Of those who have used Quagga or Bird, or anything else,
> > would either of them be appropriate and/or well suited for
> > use as an iBGP blackhole route server?
>
To expand the opinion set, how do Quagga, Bird, exaBGP, OpenBGPd hold up for
handling Multi-Protocol BGP Route Reflector duties in a BGP/MPLS environment
for a smaller ISP? Quagga's documentation indicates that is does handle the
requirements. Any one able to offer up real life experiences? Or is it
better to handle in a physical router? We being C based.
Ray.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
