[155758] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Arnold Nipper)
Wed Aug 22 15:44:09 2012

Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 21:43:19 +0200
From: Arnold Nipper <arnold@nipper.de>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <5034A4BE.7010804@linx.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig00153B069CE519C0B21B53C2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 22.08.2012 11:22, John Souter wrote:
> On 22/08/12 06:19, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>> ...Any feedback appreciated.
>=20
> I can't speak too highly of BIRD.  Our use case is probably not
> completely typical, but our multilateral peering route servers have bee=
n
> hugely improved by switching to BIRD.  Our two primary route servers,
> one for each LINX London LAN, use BIRD; the two secondaries use an
> enhanced version of Quagga.
>=20
> The BIRD route server scales better, gives much higher performance, is
> much more robust, and is much easier to restart - especially when there=

> are lots of connected sessions.  The development team are fantastic:
> very active and responsive, and especially responsive to the needs of
> the IXP community.
>=20
> Switching hats to Euro-IX, BIRD is now the most used route server
> amongst IXPs, as can be seen from our latest annual report:
> https://www.euro-ix.net/documents/1024-Euro-IX-IXP-Report-pdf?download=3D=
yes
>=20

+1 ... I guess we at DE-CIX perhaps run the largest routeserver setups
with full as-path and prefix-list filtering. BIRD really was some
magnitudes of perfomance improvement compared to Quagga.

In the meantime some of us (LINX, INEX, DE-CIX) also supported
development of Quagga as a routeserver. Biggest issue currently is to
get this code into mainline Quagga to make it suitabke for further
development and improvement.

Personally I would like to see more work on all three opensource
implementations, i.e. BIRD, OpenBGPd and Quagga.



Arnold
--=20
Arnold Nipper  CTO/COO              e-mail: arnold.nipper@de-cix.net
DE-CIX Management GmbH              mobile: +49 152 5371 7690
Lichtstr. 43i, 50825 Koeln          phone:  +49 69 1730 902 22
Geschaeftsfuehrer Harald A. Summa   fax:    +49 69 4056 2716
Registergericht AG Koeln HRB 51135  http://www.de-cix.net


--------------enig00153B069CE519C0B21B53C2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAlA1NlcACgkQrz6CwpRB/EzBKgCgls2CO31ctjwBXC9EpuPNQgJu
uV0AoJeY44kEQTvOl4OoWrABxczW1qox
=xz0C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig00153B069CE519C0B21B53C2--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post