[155588] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IRR-clueful person at 3356?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike Simkins)
Fri Aug 17 12:06:15 2012
From: Mike Simkins <mike.simkins@sungard.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.1208171127490.4715@soloth.lewis.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 12:04:51 -0400
To: jlewis@lewis.org, rs@seastrom.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
That's the sort of thing we have in Europe, downstream customer need to be
in your AS-SET for filtering purposes
----- Original Message -----
From: Jon Lewis [mailto:jlewis@lewis.org]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 11:29 AM
To: Robert E. Seastrom <rs@seastrom.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Re: IRR-clueful person at 3356?
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
> The telemetry I'm getting (thirdhand and believed to originate from
> first line support) suggests that both Level(3)'s direct customer and
> any downstreams of that customer need to be in the same IRR component.
Can't say for sure if it's true, but I've been told the same thing by
Level3 support.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route
Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are
Atlantic Net |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
