[155552] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: DNS Changer items
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed Aug 15 14:35:24 2012
To: Randy Whitney <randy.whitney@verizon.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:51:32 -0400."
<502BC584.7080708@verizon.com>
From: valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:34:08 -0400
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1345055648_2183P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:51:32 -0400, Randy Whitney said:
> Perhaps it should not have been re-allocated at all, rather than cause
> the unsuspecting allocatee trouble they would not have seen from
> clean(er) space.
"unsuspecting"??!?
You want a clean prefix, get some IPv6 space instead. Anybody who is
getting IPv4 space in 2012 and doesn't realize that they're getting "scraping
the bottom of the barrel" quality prefixes will get what they deserve for
not doing their due diligence (i.e. paying attention the last decade or so).
--==_Exmh_1345055648_2183P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=FmNo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1345055648_2183P--