[155367] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGPttH. Neustar can do it, why can't we?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Helms)
Mon Aug 6 16:17:10 2012
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 16:16:34 -0400
From: Scott Helms <khelms@ispalliance.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <40712D04-C184-4DE9-A7D0-D8917AD8D4E3@delong.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Probability is much too strong IMO. Most businesses don't even consider
multi-homing and many that do use NAT devices with several connections
rather than trying to run BGP.
#not associated nor do I recommend, just an example
http://www.fatpipeinc.com/warp/index.html
> This ignores the probability that cost effective BGP service availability would
> strongly drive demand for AS Numbers and adoption of the technology.
>
> Owen
>
>
>
--
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
--------------------------------
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
--------------------------------
