[155345] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGPttH. Neustar can do it, why can't we?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Mon Aug 6 10:10:11 2012
In-Reply-To: <CAP-guGUCOrjDpF6DXvs_FAaXO4afsds=0OjPTLoEkdKVSAS5_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 10:08:45 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:07 AM, William Herrin <bill@herrin.us> wrote:
> As much as I'd love for
> Verizon to offer BGP directly over FIOS there are fewer than 40,000
I'm curious as to your number... where is that from?
Marhsall had noted a number of 'small businesses' in the US at ~1.4m
as of ~2006ish?
I'd think that there are many use-cases where BGP is useful for end
users of FIOS, turning out a 'business' class of service without BGP
seems like a less useful 'business' solution (especially where the sla
isn't really much better than the consumer solution).
-chris
