[155311] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 End User Fee
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jimmy Hess)
Sat Aug 4 11:59:37 2012
In-Reply-To: <20120804100111.GS12615@leitl.org>
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 10:59:09 -0500
From: Jimmy Hess <mysidia@gmail.com>
To: Eugen Leitl <eugen@leitl.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 8/4/12, Eugen Leitl <eugen@leitl.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 08:31:06PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
> onboard (as most smartphones and tablets do).
> 24 + 24 + 16 bits are just enough to represent
> a decent-resolution WGS84 position fix. Plus,
> GPS gives you a pretty accurate clock.
Yes, very interesting. I wonder how do you achieve full scale
software testing for a mesh networking platform efficiently?
Do any of the virtual machine monitors Xen, KVM, etc
support an emulated 802.11n/other radio device that allows you to
configure "Emulated location and geography" for each virtual node,
to test various protocols and implementations across p2p wireless
meshes by simulating realistic connectivity performance?
--
-JH
