[155265] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 End User Fee
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cutler James R)
Fri Aug 3 16:49:23 2012
From: Cutler James R <james.cutler@consultant.com>
In-Reply-To: <5FE1FB6D43B8A647BBC821840C1AEA8B017C12@ocsbs.ocosa.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 16:48:51 -0400
To: "Otis L. Surratt, Jr." <otis@ocosa.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Aug 3, 2012, at 3:22 PM, "Otis L. Surratt, Jr." <otis@ocosa.com> =
wrote:
> Anyone charging end users for IPv6 space yet? :p
>=20
> <snip/>
> Otis=20
>=20
I can't imagine that this would be anything but counterproductive. End =
users are not interested in IPv6 - most would not recognize IPv6 if it =
fell out of their screen. End users want working connectivity, not =
jargon. =20
James R. Cutler
james.cutler@consultant.com
