|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 09:59:18 -0800 (PST) From: "Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI" <blkirk@float.eli.net> To: north american nominated origin of gossip <nanog@merit.edu> In-Reply-To: <852565BC.00584CC1.00@notes950.cc.bellcore.com> As I mentioned in my original post, I will summarize the responses I received. This is fairly easy since I only got one message and it said simply, "Use the RADB". To a company like the one I'm currently participating in, using the RADB is unacceptable because they want to have complete security and control over the database. This is rather short-sited, but it's not my decision. I'll be researching more in the near future and send an update then. --Ben Kirkpatrick. On Tue, 3 Mar 1998 someone wrote: > on 2/9/98, you sent a posting to nanog, asking what most large NSP's were > doing in the way of routing registries? RADB or a local database....what > kind of responses did you get?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |