[155153] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Update from the NANOG Communications Committee regarding recent
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Panashe Flack)
Mon Jul 30 13:24:25 2012
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 21:04:36 +0200
From: Panashe Flack <lists222@m.l.vaunt.eu>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20120728163636.49bf4f44@segv>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> As a quick update, we've implemented some list settings last week to help to
> keep spam off the list. New subscribers are moderated until we're comfortable
> with their posts. We rejected the idea of keyword based message filtering
> since not only is a lot of work to maintain, it's trivial to get around it if
> you really want to post banned words.
>
> Comments and suggestions are welcome.
>
>
> Matt Griswold, on behalf of the NANOG Communications Committee
>
I dislike this change - how long are subscribers considered "new"? I
believe (and I hope I'm wrong) that with this new rule the nanog
maiing list will turn into another fulldisc (list activity greatly
reduced) by this change. Before this change I had thought of nanog as
the new fulldisc - I guess I will have to find yet ANOTHER mailing
list for continued activity. And just for reference - have you guys
SEEN the "Linux Kernel Mailing List"? - it gets frequent spam posts
and yet is perfectly able to ignore the spam/irrelevant posts and
continue on its remit.