[155097] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Weekly Routing Table Report
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Geoff Huston)
Wed Jul 25 22:17:29 2012
From: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <451C7E1E-7F98-44FD-8EB4-7F3F118E3261@puck.nether.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:16:50 +1000
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 21/07/2012, at 6:40 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>=20
> On Jul 20, 2012, at 4:30 PM, Ron Broersma wrote:
>=20
>>=20
>> On Jul 20, 2012, at 1:04 PM, valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>>> On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 05:10:41 +1000, Routing Analysis Role Account =
said:
>>>> BGP routing table entries examined: =
418048
>>> So, whatever happened to that whole "the internet will catch fire =
when
>>> we get to 280K routing table entries" or whatever it was? :)
>>=20
>> We added memory where we could, or bought bigger routers. The new =
(conventional wisdom) limit is 1M routes.
>=20
> I think you mean 512k IPv4 with 256k of IPv6 (taking double space).
512K of IPv4? That's getting close!
Geoff
