[155009] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: MPLS L2VPN monitoring
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jason Iannone)
Thu Jul 19 12:36:46 2012
In-Reply-To: <72A2F9AF18EC024C962A748EA6CF75B90EC2CDE0@W8USSFJ204.ams.gblxint.com>
From: Jason Iannone <jason.iannone@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:35:39 -0600
To: "North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
We also use UNI NIDs that trap interface status, log interface and COS
queue statistics, and respond to y.1731 traffic.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Siegel, David <Dave.Siegel@level3.com> wro=
te:
> We deploy NIDs to the customer premise. You just can't get enough alarm =
data be looking only at your router/switch on your side of an Ethernet NNI =
to give you a proper indication of whether the service is functional, and i=
t also happens to be quite handy to have when a performance test/verificati=
on is required.
>
> There are a variety of vendors out there to choose from...we have quite a=
lot of Tellabs and Accedian out in the field.
>
> I had hoped that last mile vendors would have been providing NIDs "smartj=
ack" style by now in a fairly ubiquitous fashion, but alas none of them hav=
e stepped up to the plate so we're still putting them out there on our own =
dime.
>
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Ehiwe [mailto:peterehiwe@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 4:14 AM
> To: North American Network Operators' Group
> Subject: MPLS L2VPN monitoring
>
> Hello ,
>
> For those who provide l2vpn services to customers over MPLS , what kind o=
f tools do you use for monitoring the circuits and what kind of values do =
you proactively monitor
>
> I have tools in place to monitor these circuits but i want to know based =
on group members experiences in order to improve my monitoring platform for=
this circuits.
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
>
