[154980] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Saku Ytti)
Wed Jul 18 10:02:09 2012
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 17:00:59 +0300
From: Saku Ytti <saku@ytti.fi>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <5006BE8D.5080705@sprunk.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On (2012-07-18 08:47 -0500), Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> And, if they did, who cares? It's not like it hurts me for them to do
> so--unless I'm dumb enough to do the same thing, happened to get the
> same result /and/ happened to merge with them--all of which are still
> unlikely events.
In which case, you could prove you did the right thing. I'm not disagreeing
with you that benefits are marginal (I think most 'randomly' choose 0
anyhow).
I'm asking, what would the recommend method lose by being verifiable?
--
++ytti
