|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 16:36:54 -0700 From: Seth Mattinen <sethm@rollernet.us> To: nanog@nanog.org In-Reply-To: <5005EDD7.1040304@unfix.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org On 7/17/12 3:57 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote: > > I am wondering what you meaning with 'squat', note that what I reference > above is real full RFC4193 calculated ULA. > By "squat" I meant take a random chunk of IPv6 space and use it as "private" address space. He said: On 7/13/12 7:38 AM, -Hammer- wrote: > I was considering taking the same approach. Maybe using 0100::/8 or > 1000::/4 or A000::/3 as a space for this. And I would say no, use ULA space instead since it's set aside for such things. ~Seth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |