[154961] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Doug Barton)
Tue Jul 17 13:49:58 2012
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:49:27 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
To: Saku Ytti <saku@ytti.fi>
In-Reply-To: <20120717124713.GA10157@pob.ytti.fi>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 7/17/2012 5:47 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> I wonder who really believes there is no usage case for NAT66. Have these
> people seen non-trivial corporate networks?
>
> I'm sure many people in this list finance part of their lives with renumber
> projects costing MUSDs. For many companies just finding out where addresses
> have been punched in (your FWs, your software, partner FWs, partner
> software, configurations...) will take months, before even starting
> renumbering.
For those with PA space https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6144 should be a
good solution.
Doug
--
If you're never wrong, you're not trying hard enough
