[154881] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike Jones)
Sun Jul 15 13:23:32 2012
In-Reply-To: <5002E89C.1040801@Janoszka.pl>
From: Mike Jones <mike@mikejones.in>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 18:22:04 +0100
To: Grzegorz Janoszka <Grzegorz@janoszka.pl>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 15 July 2012 16:58, Grzegorz Janoszka <Grzegorz@janoszka.pl> wrote:
> Allowing 2000::/3 is fine as well. Btw - what are the estimates - how
> long are we going to be within 2000::/3?
>
I expect it to be long enough that we can enjoy lots of discussions
about how to deal with broken route filtering and broken software that
assumes only 2000::/3 is valid, and we can talk about how we should
have seen this coming and done something differently to prevent it.
- Mike
