[154858] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (-Hammer-)
Sat Jul 14 16:15:27 2012
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 15:14:45 -0500
From: -Hammer- <bhmccie@gmail.com>
To: Brandon Ross <bross@pobox.com>,
<nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSX.4.64.1207132140380.382@cevin-2.local>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Guys,
The whole purpose of this is that they do NOT need to be global.
Security thru obscurity. It actually has a place in some worlds. Does that
make sense? Or are such V4-centric approaches a bad thing in v6?
On 7/13/12 8:41 PM, "Brandon Ross" <bross@pobox.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>> On Jul 13, 2012, at 4:24 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>
>>> keep life simple. use global ipv6 space.
>>>
>>> randy
>>
>> Though it is rare, this is one time when I absolutely agree with Randy.
>
>It's even more rare for me to agree with Randy AND Owen at the same time.
>
>--
>Brandon Ross Yahoo & AIM:
>BrandonNRoss
>+1-404-635-6667 ICQ:
>2269442
>Schedule a meeting: https://tungle.me/bross Skype:
>brandonross
>
