[154781] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Cisco Update

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeroen van Aart)
Wed Jul 11 16:06:29 2012

Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 13:04:37 -0700
From: Jeroen van Aart <jeroen@mompl.net>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <201207071430.q67EUDjx019523@aurora.sol.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Joe Greco wrote:
> No, really, how bad an idea can it be to have a central database and
> a system that's allowed to remotely log in, configure, and update 
> thousands of Internet-connected CPE?  I mean, talk about making an
> attractive target.

No argument against the lack of wisdom regarding this cisco thing, but...

As a botnet operator in the business of making money (and thus relying 
on the availability of your botnets) why go through the bother of 
compromising such system and creating a botnet (which will be rather 
quickly fixed once the breach is noticed) when you can do it easily 
enough sending out a simple email with the proper binary code attached, 
relying on the PEBKAC paradigm. ;-)

This method has been proven to be very effective, considering many 100s 
of millions of zombie computers exist.

Greetings,
Jeroen

-- 
Earthquake Magnitude: 4.6
Date: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 10:54:36 UTC
Location: near the east coast of Honshu, Japan
Latitude: 35.9986; Longitude: 140.9388
Depth: 27.40 km


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post