[154704] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Any advantage of announcing IPv6/64s Or purely misconfiguration?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Justin M. Streiner)
Mon Jul 9 11:18:05 2012
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 11:16:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner@cluebyfour.org>
To: NANOG Mailing List <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ0+aXY26JV8i6Dmh5nOgjaAFTOZSwb64m8+MGk-XZCws4TmDw@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
> I was just looking around and say a major Indian provider Sify (AS9583) is
> announcing /64s via BGP along with main /32 which is their allocation from
> APNIC.
> inet6num: 2001:0E48::/32
I only see 2001:e48::/32 in my view of the v6 routing table. If any of my
upstream providers don't drop anything smaller than a /48, I do...
jms
