[154699] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Any advantage of announcing IPv6/64s Or purely misconfiguration?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Frank Habicht)
Mon Jul 9 04:14:35 2012
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 11:13:42 +0300
From: Frank Habicht <geier@geier.ne.tz>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4FFA8C23.6080501@bogus.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 7/9/2012 10:45 AM, Joel jaeggli wrote:
> On 7/9/12 00:09 , Aftab Siddiqui wrote:
>>>
>>> As per IPv6 prefixes announced by AS9583 via bgp.he.net -
>>> http://bgp.he.net/AS9583#_prefixes6 we can see multiple /64s.
>
> you likely won't see them in your table though.
as direct customer of 6453 I see them. :-(
before starting to filter.
6453: will you filter them?
Frank
#sh bgp ipv6 u 2001:0E48::/32 lo
BGP table version is 2543917, local router ID is 41.188.128.35
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale, m multipath, b backup-path, x
best-external, f RT-Filter, a additional-path
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*>i2001:E48::/32 2001:5A0:C00:400::5
0 30 0 6453 9583 i
*>i2001:E48:0:1::/64
2001:5A0:C00:400::5
0 30 0 6453 9583 ?
*>i2001:E48:0:2::/64
2001:5A0:C00:400::5
0 30 0 6453 9583 ?
*>i2001:E48:0:4::/64
2001:5A0:C00:400::5
0 30 0 6453 9583 ?
*>i2001:E48:0:5::/64
2001:5A0:C00:400::5
0 30 0 6453 9583 ?
*>i2001:E48:0:6::/64
2001:5A0:C00:400::5
0 30 0 6453 9583 ?
*>i2001:E48:0:7::/64
2001:5A0:C00:400::5
0 30 0 6453 9583 ?
*>i2001:E48:0:8::/64
2001:5A0:C00:400::5
0 30 0 6453 9583 ?
