[154642] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: job screening question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Jul 6 19:11:01 2012
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 07 Jul 2012 00:07:57 +0100."
<4FF76FCD.6070405@foobar.org>
From: valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 19:09:54 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1341616194_2172P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 00:07:57 +0100, Nick Hilliard said:
> 4) you get caught out in the interview as being puffed up, but the company
> hires you anyway despite strongly worded objections from the interviewer,
> causing the interviewer's eyes to spin in their sockets at the inanity of
> the decision. You then spend your entire employment at the company proving
> your ineptitude beyond all possible doubt.
>
> I think this is a win, is it?
Yeah - it's a better gig than you would have landed otherwise, isn't it? :)
--==_Exmh_1341616194_2172P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=/+c+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1341616194_2172P--
