[154587] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: job screening question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy)
Fri Jul 6 00:18:12 2012
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 21:17:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Randy <randy_94108@yahoo.com>
To: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
In-Reply-To: <CAP-guGUtLZCoVkTUNY5GUw2CbBSsvW6_Nju+UCMpt4K9o5Z0Vw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--- On Thu, 7/5/12, William Herrin <bill@herrin.us> wrote:
> From: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
> Subject: Re: job screening question
> To: "Randy" <randy_94108@yahoo.com>
> Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
> Date: Thursday, July 5, 2012, 7:36 PM
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:10 PM,
> Randy <randy_94108@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > How about another HR-Question:
> >
> > what do 0.0.0.0/1 and 128.0.0.0.0/1 as static-routes
> accomplish?
>=20
> Override the dynamic (e.g. DHCP) default route. Often so you
> can
> implement a workaround that central Network Security
> wouldn't approve
> of. :-)
<smile>
Yes of course! But NOT the "answer" I am looking for(..and want to hear..) =
because -
1) having such default-routes "internally" is a terribly-bad/broken idea.
I am looking for a "candidate" who can actually say the same and go on to s=
ay: "it is a kludge that can be put in place to load-share between two link=
s to upstreams when "budgetary-constraints" prevent us from anything but st=
atic-routing - two upstreams terminating on the same router.
There You go:
So, There are some questions (includes Your original-question) that HR shou=
ld not be asking.
There is a big difference between Engineering-Management and Management-Eng=
ineering.....(Morton Thiokol/Challenger is a classic case in point.)
Regards,
./Randy
>=20
> Regards,
> Bill Herrin
>=20
> --=20
> William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com=A0
> bill@herrin.us
> 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
>
