[154386] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: F-ckin Leap Seconds, how do they work?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Tue Jul 3 13:17:19 2012
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120703143955.GA15933@pob.ytti.fi>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 10:11:23 -0700
To: Saku Ytti <saku@ytti.fi>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jul 3, 2012, at 7:39 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On (2012-07-03 10:33 -0400), valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>=20
>> On the other hand, how many subtle bugs will we introduce when we =
break
>> code that currently assumes the system clock is UTC, not TAI?
>=20
> Progress has non zero cost :)
>=20
> --=20
> ++ytti
Trading one known set of bugs for a (probably) larger set of unknown =
bugs is not my definition of progress. Cost without progress is harmful =
and should be avoided.
Owen
