[154190] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: No DNS poisoning at Google (in case of trouble, blame the DNS)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jason Hellenthal)
Wed Jun 27 09:27:19 2012

Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:26:05 -0400
From: Jason Hellenthal <jhellenthal@dataix.net>
To: Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA9D9A39-1480-4742-8542-02C5045699AC@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org


What would be nice is the to see the contents of the htaccess file
(obviously with sensitive information excluded)

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:14:12AM -0300, Arturo Servin wrote:
> 
> It was not DNS issue, but it was a clear case on how community-support helped.
> 
> Some of us may even learn some new tricks. :)
> 
> Regards,
> as
> 
> Sent from mobile device. Excuse brevity and typos.
> 
> 
> On 27 Jun 2012, at 05:07, Daniel Rohan <drohan@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>wrote:
> > 
> > What made you think it can be a DNS cache poisoning (a very rare
> >> event, despite what the media say) when there are many much more
> >> realistic possibilities (<troll>specially for a Web site written in
> >> PHP</troll>)?
> >> 
> >> What was the evidence pointing to a DNS problem?
> >> 
> > 
> > It seems likely that he made a mistake in his analysis of the evidence.
> > Something that could happen to anyone when operating outside of a comfort
> > zone or having a bad day. Go easy.
> > 
> > -DR
> 

-- 

 - (2^(N-1))


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post