[154049] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 /64 links (was Re: ipv6 book recommendations?)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Masataka Ohta)
Fri Jun 22 08:49:34 2012
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 21:46:35 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <09D57D42-2EF5-4330-9679-BBA57D0E1BFA@delong.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Owen DeLong wrote privately to me, but as I think I need
public responses, I'm Ccing to nanog fairly quoting part
of his response:
>> Moreover, it is easy to have a transport protocol with
>> 32bit or 48bit port numbers with the end to end fashion
>> only by modifying end part of the Internet.
> The center part of the internet is the easiest part of
> modification for IPv6 and is probably somewhere near 99%
> complete at this point.
That is a fairy tale once believed by so many infants who
thought dual stack were enough.
They still believed the fairy tale even when they designed
automated tunneling.
But, as most of them have grown up a little not to believe
fairly tales, they are trying other possibilities.
However, so far, they are not so successful.
Masataka Ohta
PS
Rest of his response is omitted, because I think it is
not worth quoting.
