[154017] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 /64 links (was Re: ipv6 book recommendations?)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Karl Auer)
Thu Jun 21 04:13:19 2012
From: Karl Auer <kauer@biplane.com.au>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <6304710.10262.1340233522086.JavaMail.root@benjamin.baylink.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:12:13 +1000
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 19:05 -0400, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> Ah, you're on the "I should be required to allow direct outside
> connection to my interior machines if I want to be connected to the
> Internet" crowd.
Speaking for myself, I'm one of the "if I want to allow direct outside
connection to my interior machines I should be able to" crowd. And also
one of the "if I and someone else want to connect our hosts directly we
should be able to" crowd.
That is, I don't want the architecture of the Internet to be crippled by
NAT everywhere. If you want to NAT *your* network, go for it. As a local
stalwart is wont to say, "I encourage my competitors to do that" ;-)
Regards, K.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer (kauer@biplane.com.au)
http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer
GPG fingerprint: AE1D 4868 6420 AD9A A698 5251 1699 7B78 4EEE 6017
Old fingerprint: DA41 51B1 1481 16E1 F7E2 B2E9 3007 14ED 5736 F687
