[153958] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NTT handing packets to Reliance (Flag Telecom) in California for
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Tue Jun 19 17:04:00 2012
In-Reply-To: <CAJ0+aXZ5dN1o3KPf0u6UXYETC8H=WqoS7-b=Ww-7HJ00PTL1XQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 17:02:56 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Anurag Bhatia <me@anuragbhatia.com>
Cc: NANOG Mailing List <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Anurag Bhatia <me@anuragbhatia.com> wrote:
> I wonder what exactly is different/wrong in case of BSNL block
> 117.200.48.0/20? Is BSNL selectively announcing it only from Reliance's
> California based router and not any other router in Europe?
there's a fiber cut in that part of the world, and reliance is ... in
the middle of it (smwe-4 I think?) maybe they decided that some of
their customer traffic ought to take a less congested path?
