[153927] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ZOMG: IPv6 a plot to stymie FBI !!!11!ONE!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joel jaeggli)
Sun Jun 17 17:02:36 2012
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 14:02:18 -0700
From: Joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
To: valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu
In-Reply-To: <35465.1339964531@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>, Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 6/17/12 13:22 , valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 10:53:52 -0700, Joel jaeggli said:
>> On 6/17/12 10:24 , valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>
>>> So - who owns 2800:af:ba30:e8cf:4881:973a:c68? And how does an LEO
>>> find that info quickly if they need to figure out who to hand a warrant to?
>>
>> so first of you introduced a typo
>
> Aha. Somebody's paying attention :) That's exactly the sort of thing you'll end
> up seeing a lot more of if you have to start chasing through 2 and 3 hops
> of provider-customer-subcustomer.
Yes, in a previous $job I have been served court authorized requests
that are incorrect. I have provided helpful advice.
> It's easy to notice that an IPv4 address
> is missing an octet - a lot harder to tell you have 7 chunks rather than 8,
> plus you're left wondering whether you dropped 16 bits, or if one of the :
> should be a :: instead.
If one enters the wrong number the right answer will rarely be forthcoming.
> But Joel - you *really* need to get out more. ;)
yes
