[153860] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: best practives multi-homed BGP 2 physical locations
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Philip Lavine)
Thu Jun 14 18:34:54 2012
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 15:33:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Philip Lavine <source_route@yahoo.com>
To: Mick O'Rourke <mkorourke@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM7FjJe5w7M7xWuUhQLkbw44cq1_c0uU4HEbXbBD__z=MU5PHA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: Philip Lavine <source_route@yahoo.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Easy part:=0AI need to provide my users acces to the internet from my HQ si=
te via a local Internet connection or via a=A0colo.=A0 =0A=A0=0AHard part:=
=0AI also need to provide incoming access to hosted apps (HTTP, FTP, SMTP) =
from either location, so if the colo internet connection goes down the traf=
fic can re-route to the HQ server farm and visa versa.=0AI am in the proces=
s of purchasing an AS and ip space. Is it advisable to use the same IP spac=
e at both locations and run iBGP over a dedicated L2 connection between the=
sites.=0A=A0=0AP=0A=A0 =0A=0A________________________________=0A From: Mic=
k O'Rourke <mkorourke@gmail.com>=0ATo: Philip Lavine <source_route@yahoo.co=
m> =0ACc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org> =0ASent: Thursday, June 14, 2=
012 2:48 PM=0ASubject: Re: best practives multi-homed BGP 2 physical locati=
ons=0A =0A=0AAs in =0A- use of multi or single AS?=0A- private, vpn or oth=
er dci?=0A- etc =0AWhat's the purpose of the site? Or what end result are y=
ou trying to achieve?=0A =0AOn Jun 15, 2012 6:04 AM, "Philip Lavine" <sourc=
e_route@yahoo.com> wrote:=0A=0A=A0Is there any best practices documentation=
on how to run BGP multihoming accross two phyiscally seperated sites.=0A>
