[153836] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Patch Management - Windows & RHEL/CentOS based on Date
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andrew Latham)
Wed Jun 13 19:50:26 2012
In-Reply-To: <1FED9134A6AFF44581924E5576E4DD863609A4BC@VCVANMAILMB1.vci.local>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 19:50:22 -0400
From: Andrew Latham <lathama@gmail.com>
To: Wade Peacock <Wade.Peacock@visioncritical.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Wade Peacock
<Wade.Peacock@visioncritical.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Does anyone know of a patch management system that will allow us to contr=
ol the roll out of patches, specifically for Windows but Linux would be nic=
e too, that can use a date to limit whether a patch is rolled out.
>
> Ie.
>
> Patch to date set to =C2=A0 =C2=A02012-06-10
>
> So all patches released up to 2012-06-10 will be offer to requesting clie=
nt. Any patches released after 2012-06-10 will be hidden/not offered until =
the "Patch to Date" is moved forward.
>
> Wade Peacock
> Production IT | Vision Critical
> direct =C2=A0604.629.9358
> mobile =C2=A0604.363.8137
>
> www.visioncritical.com<http://www.visioncritical.com/>
>
> New York =C2=A0| =C2=A0London =C2=A0| =C2=A0Vancouver | =C2=A0Paris =C2=
=A0| Sydney =C2=A0| =C2=A0Chicago | =C2=A0San Francisco | Toronto | Montrea=
l | Calgary
>
I am unsure of some details but will blindly suggest you look at
wpkg.org as a method of deployment for Microsoft Windows products.
--=20
~ Andrew "lathama" Latham lathama@gmail.com http://lathama.net ~
