[153765] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 /64 links (was Re: ipv6 book recommendations?)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Masataka Ohta)
Tue Jun 12 05:44:10 2012
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:42:53 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <1339493145.15324.229.camel@karl>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Karl Auer wrote:
>> : I've seen links with up to 15k devices where ARP represented
>> : a significant part of the link usage, but most weren't (yet) IPv6.
>>
>> MLD noise around a router is as bad as ARP/ND noise.
>
> Possibly true, but that's another discussion.
Then, you could have simply argued that there is no ARP
problem with IPv6, because ND, not ARP, were another
discussion.
>> That's how IPv6 along with SLAAC is totally broken.
>
> I think we have different ideas of what constitutes "totally" broken.
It is because you avoid to face the reality of MLD.
Masataka Ohta
