[153666] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mikael Abrahamsson)
Sun Jun 10 11:13:04 2012
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:12:29 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m24nqjgqbv.wl%randy@psg.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, Randy Bush wrote:
> the key question to me is when will my normal dns rbwls support ipv6?
> in exim-speak
>
> and this time let's skip the usual round of telling me the worth of each
> element of my selection.
My thoughts on this is that unless ISPs start to announce what "one
customer" is, this is pretty hard. It's a problem in IPv4, but even more
so in IPv6.
Wouldn't it help a lot if there was a way to publish that "in this /42,
there is one customer per /56, and in this other /42, there is one
customer per /48"?
How can that be done via DNS (if that is still a favourable mechanism to
distribute information like this)? Whois is not a good way...
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
